Hi Benoit, Anand, Using `primaries` instead of `remote-servers` does not solves the problem for me here (I tried on 9.18, 9.20 and the development branch). Note that `primaries` and `remote-servers` are essentially synonyms; see https://bind9.readthedocs.io/en/stable/changelog.html#id25
It sounds like a bug. https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/bind9/-/issues/5646 In meantime the key can be defined per-IP address, although it's not convenient: remote-servers secondaries-server-list { 10.64.1.43 key internal-key; 10.64.1.44 key internal-key; 10.128.37.66 key internal-key; 10.128.37.67 key internal-key; }; Regards, Colin Vidal On Wed, 2025-11-19 at 14:23 +0530, Anand Buddhdev wrote: > On 19/11/2025 14:08, POULET Benoit wrote: > > Hi Benoit, > > > Do you know if we can set a named group of servers to use it in a > > zone statement ? > > Yes, you can. > > > The goal is to do something like this to notify the secondaries, > > this way I can set only one time my IPs and call them by the name > > in the zone > > statement : > > > > remote-servers secondaries-server-list { > > Use the keyword "primaries" instead of "remote-servers". > > > 10.64.1.43; > > 10.64.1.44; > > 10.128.37.66; > > 10.128.37.67; > > }; > > Regards, > Anand -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list.
