The mean value of the 'Nasty Boss'
Ferocity can be 'a badge of honor,' but there are costs

Friday, July 7, 2006; Posted: 8:36 p.m. EDT (00:36 GMT)

Meryl Streep plays an imperious, scary boss in the hit film "The Devil Wears 
Prada."
Image:

Manage Alerts | What Is This? NEW YORK (AP) -- A famous designer throws a 
fit and hurls a pair of scissors at his assistant. The ladies room at a top 
fashion glossy is routinely filled with weeping underlings who've been 
dressed down. One boss enforces a starvation regime: You can't go out for 
lunch, but you can't eat at your desk, either.

These could be scenes from "The Devil Wears Prada," the new film starring 
Meryl Streep as Miranda Priestly, a capricious and fear-inspiring fashion 
editor. But they're actual anecdotes from the fashion world. Insiders agree 
that the depiction of scary-boss excess in the film, and even more in the 
book, is dead-on.

But there are scary, capricious bosses in every field. Which raises another 
set of questions: Just why do they get away with it? And should they?

Some analysts say that in certain fields, particularly creative ones, a 
difficult, mercurial personality can actually be a status symbol.

It can even be "a badge of honor" to be a domineering boss in fashion or 
entertainment, says Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, a senior associate dean at Yale's 
School of Management. "They stir up the pot. They are agitators for change." 
Of Priestly's young, fear-struck assistant in "Prada," he says: "Did she 
think she was going to work for a librarian?"

Priestly, the fictional editor of Runway magazine, thinks nothing of 
ordering her assistant to procure an unpublished "Harry Potter" manuscript 
for her two daughters -- or to conjure up a private plane to get her home in 
the midst of a hurricane. She calls her size-6 assistant "fat" and ends all 
conversations with a flick of the wrist and a curt: "That's all."

Whether or not Priestly is based on Vogue editor in chief Anna Wintour -- 
author Lauren Weisberger, who once worked for Wintour, denies it -- the 
book's portrayal of the fashion world in general rings true with insiders.( 
Watch a clip from "Prada" that captures the hostile environment )

"If you happen to be working for the wrong editor, you could find yourself 
doing their kid's homework, or being yelled at, or crying in the bathroom," 
says Liz Lange, a leading maternity designer who put in her time as an 
assistant at an array of New York fashion glossies. "People can tend to lose 
touch with reality."

Yet Lange, who has 40 employees, doesn't think such behavior is necessary to 
get the job done.

"Not to say I'm perfect, but I don't think you need to be mean to get the 
next collection out, or the next issue," she says.

Nor does Stanford professor Robert Sutton, an organizational psychologist. 
He's developed a whole philosophy, presented in an upcoming book, on bosses 
who are, well, jerks: They're a drain on society. They shouldn't be hired in 
the first place, and if they won't change their ways, they should be fired.

"The No-(Expletive) Rule" (fill in a vulgar anatomical reference that we 
can't print here), coming out early next year, was born of a Harvard 
Business Review column Sutton wrote that drew hundreds of e-mails. He 
defines a you-know-what as "somebody who makes you constantly feel demeaned 
and lessened."

Researching his book, Sutton Googled the names of top CEOs along with that 
you-know-what word. He says he found a whopping 60,000 hits for Steve Jobs, 
the co-founder of Apple Computer Inc. and the largest Disney shareholder.

Jobs, Sutton says, "is highly effective at pushing people to perfection -- 
and yet he goes insane over the smallest things. He can be extremely cruel." 
Yet Jobs is so smart and successful, Sutton notes, that he fits into a 
chapter of his book entitled, "The Virtues of (You-Know-Whats)."

Even people who resent his management style suggest that Jobs' temperament 
is "a crucial part of his success, especially his pursuit of perfection and 
relentless desire to make beautiful things," Sutton says.

Still, the costs generally outweigh the benefits, he says. He points to 
Hollywood producer Scott Rudin, who went through at least 119 assistants in 
five years, firing one for bringing the wrong kind of breakfast muffin, 
according to the Wall Street Journal. "It costs to replace all those 
people," Sutton says. Other costs, in any field: wasted time, possible 
psychological abuse, mental damage.

Of course, if you're a mean boss, it's a lot easier in the 21st century to 
have your capricious ways exposed to the public. Internal staff memos find 
their way to the Web within seconds. Juicy anecdotes are e-mailed round the 
world.

But the harm to these bosses from such bad publicity is minimal, analysts 
say. "Certainly, the behavior of nasty bosses is way more public than it 
used to be," says Jeffrey Pfeffer, a professor at Stanford's Graduate School 
of Business. "But does it have consequences? I just don't see it."

Pfeffer, who teaches a course on corporate power, says he's always trying to 
convince his students that their "just world" hypothesis -- in order to get 
ahead, you have to behave well -- is extremely naive.

"People don't understand the extent," Pfeffer says, "to which people simply 
want to associate with the rich, powerful and famous."

And of course, people love being associated with a winner. Pfeffer recalls 
Steve Spurrier, former coach of the University of Florida football team, who 
once said: "Call me arrogant, cocky, crybaby whiner or whatever names you 
like. At least they're not calling us losers anymore. If people like you too 
much, it's probably because they're beating you."

Copyright 2006 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.This material may 
not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.




------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Great things are happening at Yahoo! Groups.  See the new email design.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/TISQkA/hOaOAA/yQLSAA/wf.olB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 



BinusNet founded on Dec 28, 1998 Owner : Johan Setiawan
Moderator BinusNet : Suryadi Liawatimena & Surya Iskandar


Stop or Unsubscribe: send blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Questions or Suggestions, send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--==-=--==-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=
Bina Nusantara mempersembahkan
25 Tahun Bersama Binus untuk Indonesia
1981 - 2006

Venue: Plenary Hall, Jakarta Convention Center
Date : 25 February 2006
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--==-=--==-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/binusnet/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Kirim email ke