Hi Vincent,

Are you taking into account that quality scores will tend to drop off towards the end of the run? I would probably restrict any sort of quality filtering to the first x bases of each read... From my experience, only a very small fraction of reads out of a "good" run would be removed due to general quality issues. Also, if your further pipeline is "quality-aware" (eg MAQ/bowtie for alignments) you can get away with not worrying initially about the quality of the reads. On the other hand, for some kinds of analysis I was dropping the quality scores and making plain fasta files. In these cases it would pay off to convert very low-quality bases to Ns, since I would get better coverage.

Cheers,

Cei

Vincent Carey wrote:
i have scoured our archives and found little regarding role of solexa
quality
scores as reported in fastq outputs in short read filtering.

my understanding is that a numerical score of -4 or greater indicates more
probability
mass on the called base than on any other.  in checking 1e6 reads on each of
two lanes
i found the frequency of the event " fewer than three bases have score less
than -4" to be
4e-3 in one lane and 2e-3 in another.  in other words, filtering by
requiring no more than
two < -4 scores would take you from a million reads to about 2000-4000,
assuming i have
not taken a biased sample (i may have, just took the first 1e6 in fastq).

is there any reason to regard a call with score < -4 to be much different
from an 'N'?

        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

_______________________________________________
Bioc-sig-sequencing mailing list
[email protected]
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-sig-sequencing


--
The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute is operated by Genome Research Limited, a charity registered in England with number 1021457 and a company registered in England with number 2742969, whose registered office is 215 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BE.

_______________________________________________
Bioc-sig-sequencing mailing list
[email protected]
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-sig-sequencing

Reply via email to