I'll get the repo now. So basically having one library for each "datasource"? (Or a closely related set of sources?).
Gruss, Christian PS: good morning... * Ketil Malde <ke...@malde.org> [14.07.2011 11:43]: > > A draft of the biocore library is available for 'darcs get' from > http://malde.org/~ketil/biohaskell/biocore, please take a look and > provide feedback. > > I've started to rework biolib to use this, but I wonder if I'd rather > just move code into separate, narrower libraries. E.g. the SFF stuff no > longer needs to depend on SeqData, as SFF records can simply implement > the BioSeq class from biocore.. > > -k > -- > If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants > _______________________________________________ > Biohaskell mailing list > Biohaskell@biohaskell.org > http://malde.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/biohaskell
pgpDMB68yxi3z.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Biohaskell mailing list Biohaskell@biohaskell.org http://malde.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/biohaskell
