Ketil Malde <ke...@malde.org> writes: > Pushed 0.1 to http://malde.org:~ketil/biohaskell/biocore - feel free to > have a look.
Unless there are objections, I'm going to call this final, and push it to hackage. Objections? Well, I have a small one, regarding the Strand data type. Christian suggested that newtype-wrapping an Int would be more performant than an ADT with two nullary data constructors. Or, in code: newtype Strand = Strand Int plus, minus :: Strand plus = Strand 0 minus = Strand 1 would be better than data Strand = Plus | Minus I'm reluctant to use the former, the latter seems so much nicer, and allows pattern matching on what really is a very simple thing. And, personally, I feel that any performance disadvantage is the fault of Simon and Simon, and should not be fixed by more clumsy code. Finally, this isn't really likely to be performance bottleneck, is it? So again, unless anybody ojects, I'm intending to revert to ADT. Objections? -k -- If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants _______________________________________________ Biohaskell mailing list Biohaskell@biohaskell.org http://malde.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/biohaskell
