On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Christian Höner zu Siederdissen <choe...@tbi.univie.ac.at> wrote: > Hi, > > newest BiobaseInfernal is up, now with partial biocore and a whole lot > of newtypes in Biobase.Infernal.Types. If you want shorter names and > have good ones, please say so ;-)
Nice! I can't take a look at it now, but I'll do so ASAP. > Stuff on Stockholm files is still missing, and the CM modules are just > stubs, as both parts will change a lot. > > Felipe, didn't you have some stuff on Stockholm? and CMs? Could you make > that available? Or tell me what you would expect / like to see? About Stockholm files, did you see the biostockholm package [1]? Or do you mean something else? I'm pretty happy with my own package haha ;-). Stuff about CMs is something that I still need to refactor. But now that you brought this subject, what do you feel about your stubs? I mean, is there any problem in changing them, or are you using them for something now? I'd like to change some bad design decisions of my code before merging it with BiobaseInfernal, and I'd like to know if I'm free to bend and break your code ;-). And on a final note, I really miss a repository for BiobaseInfernal. Is there any somewhere? If "no", I'd like to suggest you either using darcs (because it rocks!) on patch-tag (not so much) or git (not so much) on github.com (because it rocks!). Cheers, =D [1] http://hackage.haskell.org/package/biostockholm -- Felipe. _______________________________________________ Biohaskell mailing list Biohaskell@biohaskell.org http://malde.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/biohaskell
