On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Christian Höner zu Siederdissen <choe...@tbi.univie.ac.at> wrote: > that sounds very exciting. I'd be very much interested in your > experience with the conduit library. I've only just (like right now) > looked at it and it says to be an alternative to iterators. The > processing rate in mbyte/sec seems ok, especially for Stockholm files.
Using conduit is just great! For me it's at least one order of magnitude easier to use than enumerators/iteratees. I'd never think about reimplementing biostockholm with enumerators, actually, but I'm now considering reimplemeting all of my libraries with conduit. Disclaimer: I've actually helped Michael while he was creating the conduit library, so I'm somewhat biased. =) > It'll probably be a few weeks before I can play with the library as I'am > currently writing my thesis. Good luck! =) Cheers, -- Felipe. _______________________________________________ Biohaskell mailing list Biohaskell@biohaskell.org http://malde.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/biohaskell
