Hi Dan,

part of the fault is indeed to be found with the summer. There has been
an important RNA meeting a couple of weeks ago, and ICFP is only three
weeks away ;-)

That being said, a new version of ADPfusion should be ready this week,
making it significantly easier to write grammars and algebras for CFGs
and similar things.

Instead of having to write
f <<< base -~+ table +~- base
you now just write
f <<< base % table % base
meaning the width of each (non-) terminal is now encoded in the (non-)
terminals and not the combinators anymore.

With some additional improvements and the extreme goodness of constraint
kinds, I believe the library closes to ADP usability and should have
surpassed it in some instances, now.

I have some major changes planned for ``my'' libraries during the fall,
to expend general usability, and have many ideas from the Benasque RNA
meeting to be implemented. During ICFP I hope to do some hands-on stuff
with SIMD for ADPfusion.

ADPfusion my highest-priority project right now, as I want to base all
my existing tools on it to improve performance -- by a lot in some
cases.

==

Regarding you wrapper project, do you want to write them yourself? I
wrote a tutorial some years ago on how to do that stuff. For more
automated work, look toward gtkhs.

Gruss,
Christian

* Dan Fornika <dforn...@gmail.com> [20.08.2012 21:10]:
> Hello Biohaskellers,
> 
> There hasn't been much action on the mailing list lately.  I'm curious
> what people are working on.
> 
> It seems like there is a lot of work to be done on splitting the
> monolithic biolib down into smaller libraries, but there doesn't seem to
> be much progress lately.
> 
> So what's going on? Is everyone out enjoying the sunshine? Have people
> receded back into the swamp of BioPerl?
> 
> Lately I've been trying to learn how to wrap a C library with the FFI.
> I'd like to wrap Dr. Jason Moore's Multifactor Dimensionality Reduction
> library (libmdr), but I've found it really very difficult to manage the
> conversion between C types and structs, and haskell types.
> 
> But I'm not asking for advice here, I'm just curious what people are up
> to, and what you see as high priority tasks to improve the biohaskell
> libraries.
> 
> Dan
> _______________________________________________
> Biohaskell mailing list
> Biohaskell@biohaskell.org
> http://malde.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/biohaskell

Attachment: pgpGlD1DpqQUu.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Biohaskell mailing list
Biohaskell@biohaskell.org
http://malde.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/biohaskell

Reply via email to