Okay, I've pushed biocore 0.2.1 to my darcs repo, now with (an exported)
Stringable instance.  Minus the "length" function, I don't like it when
things must be qualified to avoid clashing with Prelude - and at least,
I don't want to introduce things that break previously working compiles.

http://malde.org/~ketil/biohaskell/biocore - please check and see if/how
it works!

Christian Höner zu Siederdissen <choe...@tbi.univie.ac.at> writes:

> how about making everything 'ListLike'?

Yes - at least, we should provide this kind of functionality.  It's a
bit involved though, so I'd like to be more sure it's the right thing.

> Btw since we talk about this
> stuff. I'm thinking about sequences of type:
>
> newtype S t s = S (VU.Vector s)
>
> or maybe even associated data types. I want to tag ('t') things like
> what sequence we have (dna/rna/protein/any) and if are indexing
> 0-/1-based. Though for indexing I currently prefer importing to an
> internal common format with one lazy and one strict implemention.

The old Bio.Sequence used to do that, but I notice Dan removed the
phantom type in biofasta.  

Since Bio.Core is fairly agnostic about the specific data, you can
easily do this and instantiate BioSeq, I think.

-k
_______________________________________________
Biohaskell mailing list
Biohaskell@biohaskell.org
http://malde.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/biohaskell

Reply via email to