> Since Dan is positive, and Christian negative, I have created GitHub > organization, and will move my BioHaskell repos to it, encouraging Dan to > do the same.
I hear people are very happy with github and especially its collaborative features. I tried reading up on git early on, but found the interface byzantine and confusing compared to darcs - and later on, I looked at github, but the web pages are very difficult for me to read with their gray-on-gray designer look. I guess github is the inevitable end point to where users will eventually migrate, but so far, darcs has served me well and I've stuck with it. Anyway - I don't think it's a requirement that we gather all our repos in one place and with one technology, even though it simplifies some things. > Even though Git indeed makes it very convenient to fork the projects, > and distributed projects repos seem good as well. I'm not convinced 'git clone' is much all that easier than 'darcs get'. To me, things like integrated bug tracking, continous integration, and integration to Stackage etc are more compelling. > Let's see how it works. Agreed! -k -- If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants
