I'm personally a big fan of runtime exceptions but I think the argument
was about making ChangeVetoExceptions a sub class of RuntimeException. I'm
not sure if this is the same as what you are doing. What do you want to do
with them?
Mark
On Fri, 3 Aug 2001, David Huen wrote:
> Hi,
> Is there any consensus yet as to whether the above will be implmented?
>
> I'll soon be needing some means of signalling an exception on interfaces
> that don't throw Exceptions.
>
> Thanks,
> David Huen
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Biojava-l mailing list - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://biojava.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Mark Schreiber Ph: 64 3 4797875
Rm 218 email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Department of Biochemistry email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
University of Otago
PO Box 56
Dunedin
New Zealand
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
_______________________________________________
Biojava-l mailing list - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://biojava.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l
