On Tue, 23 Oct 2001, Cox, Greg wrote: > > I'm not making any proposals right now, just highlighting the > problem. Let me know if you have brilliant thoughts. >
It sucks ;). Have fun! It is this stuff (plus the fuzzies) that forced bioperl into this whole nasty location object thang. It means inside Bioperl there is just a whole truck load of implicit recursion, possible crazy object structures and ability to represent the same about 4 different ways due to the need to round-trip the whole of GenBank/EMBL. Yuk Yuk Yuk.... I've always been attracted to a model where it is Feature <---- Proper_Feature ^ |____________UnparsableGenBankEmblFeature The UnparsableGenBankEmblFeature would just have one method called location_string() ;) > Greg > _______________________________________________ > Biojava-l mailing list - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://biojava.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l > ----------------------------------------------------------------- Ewan Birney. Mobile: +44 (0)7970 151230, Work: +44 1223 494420 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. ----------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Biojava-l mailing list - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://biojava.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l
