Actually I believe it is SAX2 compliant....but I may have
missed something.

-R


"Wiepert, Mathieu" wrote:

> I would go farther than Simon and request that it must be SAX2 compliant!
> Isn't the current BlastLikeSAXParser SAX2 compliant already?  Otherwise,
> sounds great to me, thanks R.
>
> -Mat
> _______________________________________________
> Biojava-l mailing list  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://biojava.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l
begin:vcard 
n:Hubley;Robert
tel;fax:(206) 732-1299
tel;work:(206) 732-1292
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:www.systemsbiology.org
org:Institute for Systems Biology;Computational Biology
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Software Engineer
adr;quoted-printable:;;Institute for Systems Biology=0D=0A4225 Roosevelt Way NE=0D=0ASTE 200;Seattle;WA;98105-6099;USA
x-mozilla-cpt:;-9792
fn:Robert Hubley
end:vcard

Reply via email to