I like my development environment and hosting site to come from a staff of dedicated people who can offer support on demand and are determined to produce a product with LOTS of QA behind it. I think this is probably the only time I don't want open source code driving my effort. Just my opinion. I also think the money spent would be worth the time gained from NOT having to read through the source to install and configure it.
-B ----------------------- Brian Gilman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sr. Software Engineer MIT/Whitehead Inst. Center for Genome Research One Kendall Square, Bldg. 300 / Cambridge, MA 02139-1561 USA phone +1 617 252 1069 / fax +1 617 252 1902 On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, Thomas Down wrote: > On Wed, Dec 05, 2001 at 09:36:15AM -0500, Brian Gilman wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > > > Has anyone considered getting VA's "enterprise" sourceforge > > package and using that for the open-bio stuff?? It might help with > > coordination, consistent look and feel, mailing lists etc. Just a thought. > > Isn't sourceforge enterprise edition kind-of expensive? > On the other hand, there used to be an open source release of > the sourceforge code (Alexandria). Bioinformatics.org > hosts projects, and looks like it's running an alexandria > variant to me. > > Savannah is also based on the sourceforge code. It's still > open source, and appears to be under active development. > > Thomas > _______________________________________________ Biojava-l mailing list - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://biojava.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l