said proposal attached,
michael > Message: 2 > Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 15:06:45 -0500 (EST) > From: "Michael L. Heuer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [Biojava-l] Re: GO client API in biojava > > > Mattew Pocock wrote: > > > Tom Oinn wrote: > > > > > I'd be happy to put our GO browser and client API into biojava, what > > > would you need for this to work? I'm guessing that a standard schema > > > (probably the one used by the stanford people) and the appropriate ego > > > adapter for it, but then you have everything there already. > > > > This would be great. I presume from the docs that the interfaces are > > de-coupled from the database schema? The only stumbling block currently is > > that ego seems to be GPL which would kill our lGPL licensing. I'm sure we > > can come to some arrangement about that, though. > > I'm not sure if this is the best way to go. > > The ego api, although the basis for a very nice tool (thanks, Tom!), is > specific to the Gene Ontology, and is read-only. > > With structured vocabularies and ontologies becoming more prevalent in the > various bioinformatics projects (GO, biosql, DAS 2.0, etc), maybe we need > to aim a bit more general? > > I should be able to run the package of interfaces we use for a structured > vocabulary api through the lawyers this afternoon, to submit to biojava as > a proposal. > > michael >
vocabulary-PROPOSAL.tar.gz
Description: Binary data
