Seems like I'm already using these reports to see if reported bugs have been fixed yet. Thanks Thomas - it's realy usefull.
Other than seconding Mark's request for user IDs by commits, could I ask if the JUnit reports could be left off if all tests pass, or perhaps just listing those that fail? Also, I've seen ANT returning a successfull build status even when JUnit tests fail - have you double-checked the status reports in the nightly reports for correctly flaging test failures? Thanks again, Matthew --- Thomas Down <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > Once upon a time, Schreiber, Mark wrote: > > These are great! > > > > As a wish list suggestion (only if it is possible > and it can be done > > in a reasonable amount of time). Could the name of > the person > > commiting be added to the file. This will be > useful for me when > > backporting to biojava1.3 branch so I can ask the > original commiter > > if I'm not clear on how appropriate a change is to > 1.3 and what > > dependencies are needed etc. > > That's definitely on the to-do list. It didn't make > it into > the first cut because it's not entirely trivial to > do with > pure CVS commands. Current plan is to exec > something like > cvs2cl to do most of the work. This will happen, > but maybe not > for a week or two, > > Thomas. > _______________________________________________ > Biojava-l mailing list - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://biojava.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l ________________________________________________________________________ Want to chat instantly with your online friends? Get the FREE Yahoo! Messenger http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/ _______________________________________________ Biojava-l mailing list - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://biojava.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l
