-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
> BTW, in your proposal you mentioned that people had "moved on". I was > wondering what types of tasks they had moved on to, and what should be > included in the Proposal to insure that BioJava stays relevant to them? Good point. From what we can tell, people are not so sequence-focused any more but are more interested in features, alignments, population data, etc. - more 'metadata' so to speak. We do need some mechanism to ensure that we are correct in this thinking, and that future shifts in direction are catered for in this design phase. Could you add a note to the wiki with your points, and/or any ideas you may have about ensuring these requirements are met? cheers, Richard > Regards, > > Mark > > On Nov 8, 2007 5:58 AM, Richard Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > what's happened to the biojava wiki today? i get errors from all pages, > including the front page, indicating zero-sized replies. _______________________________________________ Biojava-l mailing list - [email protected] http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l >> > _______________________________________________ > Biojava-l mailing list - [email protected] > http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHMzaV4C5LeMEKA/QRAoPUAJ0TQ+xFF1J3EtZgHmvYj2HH41koCgCeLYm0 D5Z7SJDWjvJ9rbCrS+RTEeI= =XhE1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Biojava-l mailing list - [email protected] http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l
