Hi Dmitry, StAX still has higher memory consumption than SAX (still not as large as DOM) but yes it is quite a good parser system & since we're moving towards the later versions of Java may be a good idea to use it as our standard parser ... if it supports XPath (can't remember off the top of my head) :)
Andy Dmitry Repchevsky wrote: > Hello! > > Actually there is also a StAX parser (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/StAX) > which is faster when SAX and allows writing. > In JDK 6 apart of StAX there is JAXB which is a perfect combination to > parse a huge files. > You can go through the XML fie using StAX until the element you are > interested in and unmarshall it using JAXB to POJO object. > > Cheers, > > Dmitry > _______________________________________________ > Biojava-l mailing list - [email protected] > http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l _______________________________________________ Biojava-l mailing list - [email protected] http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l
