Hi guys, Thanks for clarifying this. I've updated the OBF ideas page to reflect this conversation: http://www.open-bio.org/wiki/Google_Summer_of_Code_2014_Ideas#BioJava_and_JSBML
For GSoC it's not necessary that JSBML be dropped into the BioJava codebase; there appears to be enough overlap between the developer communities that any students who take on these projects will be kept on track with the current arrangement. Once the students begin writing their project plans it should be more apparent how much BioJava will be directly involved in the coding portion of the summer. For now, we'll assume that both mailing lists will be copied on the student's weekly report, and conversations on development can take off from there. Cheers, Eric On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Andreas Dräger <[email protected]>wrote: > Dear Peter and all, > > Thank you for accepting JSBML and offering that we can participate under > BioJava :-). The reason why I referred the student to the JSBML-specific > mailing list was just that I didn't know how many JSBML-specific e-mails > BioJava developers are willing to receive. We can use both mailing lists > for GSoC now as you propose. > > BTW, JSBML uses the BioJava package for ontology parsing and there are > most likely use-cases in which both libraries could be useful within the > same project. > > Many thanks > Andreas > > -- > Dr. Andreas Draeger > University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0412, USA > Bioengineering Dept., Systems Biology Research Group, Office #2506 > Phone: +1-858-534-9717, Fax: +1-858-822-3120, twitter: @dr_drae > > _______________________________________________ Biojava-l mailing list - [email protected] http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/biojava-l
