On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 04:51:56PM +0200, Arnold Nipper wrote: > On 25.09.2010 18:49 Ondrej Zajicek wrote > > > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 07:49:00AM +0200, Bernhard Hahn wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> is it a bug or a feature, that BIRDs configuration sanity check (bird > >> -p) does not blame about multiple filter definition with the same name? > > > > Yes, this is probably a bug. > > > > While it does perhaps not really make sense to define a filter twice it > definitely does make sense if you redefine a filter when BIRD is > running. Hence you would perhaps to distinguish this situation in the > parser. Is it worth to to do this?
This is not a problem. -- Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo Ondrej 'SanTiago' Zajicek (email: [email protected]) OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net) "To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
