Ondrej Zajicek píše v St 29. 09. 2010 v 22:41 +0200: > On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 09:16:40PM +0200, Christoph Biedl wrote: > > Or should I really start bird6 as a second routing daemon to handle > > the IPv6 prefixes? > > Yes. > > > This is silly since this means duplication of the > > configuration file and all the peer detection and route switching is > > not synchronized. > > It seems silly for the first moment, but it has several advantages. > IPv4 and IPv6 usually needs slightly different configs, different filters > (esp. addresses in filters) and having separate IPv4 sessions and IPv6 > sessions means that you forward IPv4/6 routes only if IPv4/6 is really > working on the routers. >
And what about BGP+ announcing IPv6 prefixes over IPv4 connection?
