Ondrej,
--On 16 May 2011 21:59:56 +0200 Ondrej Zajicek <[email protected]>
wrote:
NSSA:
This seems to be, surprisingly for me, the most requested
feature, as it does not look hard to implement i will probably
implement that in near future.
Thanks
VRRP:
Maybe. Is there any advantage if it is integrated in routing daemon
(instead of using independent VRRP daemon)? I would guess that there
isn't any interaction between VRRP and routing, but i don't have any
experience with VRRP.
We would be interested in a sane implementation of VRRP. We'd also
be even more interested in other interfaces redundancy protocols that
do not "waste" IP addresses (e.g. do not use IP addresses for the
native interfaces). One problem with VRRP is that it is allegedly
patent encumbered.
--
Alex Bligh
