Matthew, on 29.06.2011 01:59 Matthew Walster wrote:
> I could be wrong, but the most logical explanation would be: > >> 2011-04-29 18:24:36 <RMT> XXXX: Received: Hold timer expired > > Notification received, hold timer expired (error code 3.4, as per RFC1771). > >> 2011-04-30 00:05:42 <RMT> YYYY: Error: Hold timer expired > > Hold timer expired locally. Presumably a notification would be > generated and sent to the remote peer before session tear-down. > > Is that not the case? > Would make sense. Otoh iirc <RMT> means that the message is received from the ReMoTe peer. I may be wrong. Arnold -- Arnold Nipper / nIPper consulting, Sandhausen, Germany email: [email protected] phone: +49 6224 9259 299 mobile: +49 152 53717690 fax: +49 6224 9259 333
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
