> Le 3 nov. 2014 à 17:13, Ondrej Zajicek <[email protected]> a écrit :
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 04:42:55PM +0100, Olivier Benghozi wrote:
>> Firstly, in classical BGP implementations (but not in BIRD), for eBGP 
>> connections, router-id is never used as tie-break. Instead, route age is 
>> used (the oldest one wins) as tie-break. It avoids frequent route changes 
>> and probably improves a little routes distribution.
>> You'd better use "prefer older on".
>> 
>> Secondly, a radical solution is (for incoming prefixes):
>> - upstream 1: match net ~ 0.0.0.0/1 and set MED at 1, set MED at 0 for 
>> everything else;
>> - upstream 2: match net ~ 128.0.0.0/1 and set MED at 1, set MED at 0 for 
>> everything else.
> 
> Note that you should use 'med metric' option in this case (if your
> uplinks are from different ASes).

That's right, forgot to specify that, I always use deterministic and always 
compare med (med metric on, for BIRD) features on my networks :)


Reply via email to