On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:19:31AM +0300, Alexander V.Chernikov wrote: > 25.06.2015, 10:41, "Ondrej Zajicek" <santi...@crfreenet.org>: > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 05:14:41PM -0300, Cassiano Peixoto wrote: > > i don't know about OpenBGP. I wonder if there is a better way to > > distinguish route ownership in BSD systems (like there is u8 rtm_protocol > > field in Linux). > > Well, there is auto-filled rtm_pid field, so theoretically we can check if > this pid (if filled) and flush routes > only if it is not currently running (yes, it is not ideal).
That is a possibility, but it is more complicated (e.g. different ownership checking during initiation and later) and probably not worth the effort. Seems to me like adding option to make the flag configurable would be sufficient. The similar approach is used by route6d, so it seems that it is not completely silly approach. -- Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo Ondrej 'Santiago' Zajicek (email: santi...@crfreenet.org) OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net) "To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
