> So I was referring to the text stating "the current router-id and seqno > is not used" - does that refer to all retractions or just wildcard ones?
RFC 6126 doesn't say. It should be all retractions. > Well, I've always thought about 0x40 as specifying that the router ID be > the 64 bits from the address that is semantically encoded by the TLV, > not the literal bytes in the TLV itself. Yes. > This is "for the time being", or? Surely Markus can be appeased by the > time a new draft is written? ;) I'm sure he can. -- Juliusz
