> Using random router-id seems like a good idea. Perhaps even an TLV that > describes 'nominal' configured router-id, so regular router-id could be > random, but routes could still contain configured router-id for admin > purposes. Unfortunately, Babel does not have support for something like > Opaque-LSA.
Right on all counts. > Could not help with this issue just to allow increasing seqnum by more > than 1 in reaction to recevied seqno request (3.8.1.2), to value > rcv_seqno+1 ? I'm not sure it doesn't break loop avoidance, I'd need to think it over. -- Juliusz
