Are those routes part of your own AS? Is there anything special about the rejected routes?
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 2:05 AM, Angel <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > We are configuring a new bird router, and after configure a carrier, we > can see following messages on debug every minute: > > ------------ > >>> AS174transit > added [best] 193.148.120.0/24 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0 > >>> AS174transit < rejected by protocol 193.148.120.0/24 via > 149.6.130.137 on ix0 > >>> AS174transit > added [best] 193.148.126.0/24 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0 > >>> AS174transit < rejected by protocol 193.148.126.0/24 via > 149.6.130.137 on ix0 > >>> AS174transit > added [best] 193.148.125.0/24 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0 > >>> AS174transit < rejected by protocol 193.148.125.0/24 via > 149.6.130.137 on ix0 > >>> AS174transit > added [best] 193.148.121.0/24 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0 > >>> AS174transit < rejected by protocol 193.148.121.0/24 via > 149.6.130.137 on ix0 > >>> AS174transit > added [best] 81.17.142.0/24 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0 > >>> AS174transit < rejected by protocol 81.17.142.0/24 via 149.6.130.137 > on ix0 > >>> AS174transit > added [best] 91.198.226.0/24 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0 > >>> AS174transit < rejected by protocol 91.198.226.0/24 via 149.6.130.137 > on ix0 > >>> AS174transit > added [best] 85.140.116.0/22 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0 > >>> AS174transit < rejected by protocol 85.140.116.0/22 via 149.6.130.137 > on ix0 > >>> AS174transit > added [best] 195.128.159.0/24 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0 > >>> AS174transit < rejected by protocol 195.128.159.0/24 via > 149.6.130.137 on ix0 > >>> AS174transit > added [best] 46.225.128.0/19 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0 > >>> AS174transit < rejected by protocol 46.225.128.0/19 via 149.6.130.137 > on ix0 > >>> AS174transit > added [best] 46.225.96.0/19 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0 > >>> AS174transit < rejected by protocol 46.225.96.0/19 via 149.6.130.137 > on ix0 > >>> AS174transit > added [best] 46.224.7.0/24 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0 > >>> AS174transit < rejected by protocol 46.224.7.0/24 via 149.6.130.137 > on ix0 > >>> AS174transit > added [best] 46.225.224.0/19 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0 > >>> AS174transit < rejected by protocol 46.225.224.0/19 via 149.6.130.137 > on ix0 > >>> AS174transit > added [best] 46.225.0.0/19 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0 > >>> AS174transit < rejected by protocol 46.225.0.0/19 via 149.6.130.137 > on ix0 > >>> AS174transit > added [best] 46.224.96.0/19 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0 > >>> AS174transit < rejected by protocol 46.224.96.0/19 via 149.6.130.137 > on ix0 > >>> AS174transit > added [best] 46.225.32.0/19 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0 > >>> AS174transit < rejected by protocol 46.225.32.0/19 via 149.6.130.137 > on ix0 > >>> AS174transit > added [best] 46.224.128.0/19 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0 > >>> AS174transit < rejected by protocol 46.224.128.0/19 via 149.6.130.137 > on ix0 > >>> AS174transit > ignored 109.72.148.0/22 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0 > >>> AS174transit > ignored 109.72.147.0/24 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0 > >>> AS174transit > ignored 109.72.146.0/24 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0 > >>> AS174transit > ignored 109.72.145.0/24 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0 > >>> AS174transit > ignored 109.72.144.0/24 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0 > >>> AS174transit > ignored 37.46.114.0/24 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0 > >>> AS174transit > ignored 109.248.240.0/22 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0 > >>> AS174transit > ignored 109.248.242.0/24 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0 > >>> AS174transit > ignored 109.248.241.0/24 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0 > >>> AS174transit > ignored 109.248.240.0/24 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0 > >>> AS174transit > ignored 109.248.225.0/24 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0 > >>> AS174transit > ignored 109.248.224.0/24 via 149.6.130.137 on ix0 > > ------------ > > We understand that added messages is because carrier sent us new routes, > ignored looks like that we know this route, so we do not need to add to our > table, but what about rejected messages? How could we fix it? What could > be our misconfiguration? > > Regards, > -- Jonathan
