Hi, Thank you for improving the patch.
Did I get it right? You mean the case when one has the same IP for BGP sessions in different VRFs on different interfaces? On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 7:28 PM, Ondrej Zajicek <santi...@crfreenet.org> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 12:03:57PM +0200, Alexander Zubkov wrote: > > BGP protocol could not bind to the interface in a VRF > > even if the vrf option was specified in the configuration. > > Hi > > Thanks for the bugfix, but note that in order to work with multiple BGP > protocols in different VRFs, also the selector of existing sockets that > runs before the sk_new() have to take it into consideration, otherwise it > will just return old socket bound to different VRF. See attached patch. > > -- > Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo > > Ondrej 'Santiago' Zajicek (email: santi...@crfreenet.org) > OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net) > "To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so." >