On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 12:40:42PM +0000, Kenth Eriksson wrote: > > But i do not understand the cases below, where there is no other route > > for that network and the only route does not have asterisk. > > Simplest of use case, its a default route from the kernel. But still no > asterisk. Below is a gdb trace in function rt_show_rte > > gdb) print ia > $1 = (byte *) 0xffc6c3ab "0.0.0.0/0" > (gdb) print e > $2 = (rte *) 0x56939d14 > (gdb) print e->net->routes > $3 = (struct rte *) 0x56939c54 > (gdb) print e->next > $4 = (struct rte *) 0x0 > > Obviously e->net->routes is not equal to e, thus no asterisk.
Well, i do not understand why the text output below consists of only one route, while you have 0x56939d14 and 0x56939c54. Is the text output edited? > > > consider the following: > > > > > > bird> show route 0.0.0.0/0 > > > Table master4: > > > 0.0.0.0/0 unicast [kernel1 2019-10-22] (215) > > > via 10.210.137.1 on eth1 -- Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo Ondrej 'Santiago' Zajicek (email: [email protected]) OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net) "To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."
