On Fri, 2020-06-12 at 16:01 +0200, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 12:42:56PM +0000, Kenth Eriksson wrote:
> > Why is the route fe80::7270:8bff:fee8:8081 considered dormant? OSPF and
> > static routes have different administrative distance and the static
> > route has lower AD (higher bird preference).
>
> Perhaps you do not have defined iface for link-local route? We should
> check for that and rejectlink-local routes without specified iface
> immediately. With iface, it works for me:
>
Yes static route was given as an immediate nexthop gateway ip. Why is
it not possible to resolve the outgoing interface for that case?
Neighbor table?
