On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 03:20:23PM +0100, Clemens Schrimpe wrote: > Ahoj (again) :-) > > While in the process of cleaning up "ancient" configs (basically rewriting > them from scratch) I came across an odd discovery: > > A template definition (for a kernel protocol) demands the specification of > one (and only one) channel - which, in my case, defeats the whole purpose of > having a kernel template in the first place. > > What is the intention behind this? I do understand, that -in the end- the > actual protocol defined through a template must have one (and only one in the > case of a "kernel" protocol) channel definition and in my example this > requirement would be fulfilled.
Hello (Noticed while looking for some missed / forgotten e-mails) Thanks, fixed: https://gitlab.nic.cz/labs/bird/-/commit/2a8cc7259e236773f1b8423ef63305a5b8bfd652 -- Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo Ondrej 'Santiago' Zajicek (email: [email protected]) OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net) "To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
