Hi,
why is it not possible to define BGP sessions like this?
protocol bgp g60 {
local as 64501;
neighbor as 64499;
ipv4 {
import all;
export all;
};
local 192.0.2.4;
neighbor 192.0.2.5;
};
ipv6 {
import all;
export all;
local 2001:db8::4;
neighbor 2001:db8::5;
};
};
It seems still necessary to write two bgp definitions separately for
IPv4 and IPv6 repeating the AS numbers and name.
I see no benefit from the Bird 1.6 notation here.
Regards
--
Robert Sander
Heinlein Consulting GmbH
Schwedter Str. 8/9b, 10119 Berlin
http://www.heinlein-support.de
Tel: 030 / 405051-43
Fax: 030 / 405051-19
Zwangsangaben lt. §35a GmbHG:
HRB 220009 B / Amtsgericht Berlin-Charlottenburg,
Geschäftsführer: Peer Heinlein -- Sitz: Berlin
