Even using the correct syntax as described by Ondrej I am not able to get this to work. When I try, I get the following error in my logs:
> filters, line 117: ~ applied on unknown type pair I am trying to build filters that check multiple things, add a community for each thing (if it is true), then reject the route if any of the communities exist. It doesn't seem like it's possible to check if any member of a set is in another set - only if a particular element is in another set. I.e. I can do (1,2,3) ~ bgp_large_community but not [(1,2,*)] ~ bgp_large_community Can anyone confirm? Is this possible via a different method? Thanks! On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 2:49 PM Ondrej Zajicek <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 10:00:58AM -0400, Brooks Swinnerton wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I was wondering if it's possible to create a conditional that matches on > a > > wildcard for a part of a BGP large community. For example: > > > > if ([*, 600, 6939]) ~ bgp_large_community then > > reject; > > Hello > > Note that it would be [(*, 600, 6939)], not ([*, 600, 6939]). > > But for large communities, BIRD allows wildcard only on the more specific > part. > You can have [(64496, 600, *)], [(64496, *, *)] or even [(*, *, *)], but > not > [(*, 600, 6939)]. > > Also, wildcard (*, 600, 6939) does not really make sense, as meaning of > the second and third part is determined by the first (global admin), and > may be different for different first parts. > > -- > Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo > > Ondrej 'Santiago' Zajicek (email: [email protected]) > OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net) > "To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so." >
