Hello!
From simple things like adding a route, updating a prefix-list...
Even with things like adding a new peer.
[...]
This is certainly not a simple thing to address.
But it is a pain that attacks several scenarios.
I'm sure the developers have already had deep conversations about this,
and that SMP has a higher priority.
Well, SMP has a higher priority at least in cases where the changes
collide – we've already stumbled over several merging hells and the
faster SMP gets its stable version, the faster is the other development
as well.
But could you just mention what possibilities were considered to resolve
this issue?
Mostly there are thoughts about creating a "temporary" static protocol
by a CLI command in some or other way. The discussion mostly hits the
questions of "classical" reconfiguration – the same way as the
enable-disable problem with other protocols, for which there are even
some outstanding patches.
There are also ongoing discussions on completely changing the config
structure, allowing for back-writing the actual config and being able to
maka all the changes persistent.
Another colliding topic is the client API; there is a future possibility
of just opening a socket and feeding routes directly, yet also not
exactly specified or well-planned now.
In all cases, the main question isn't how to add the routes. That's the
simple part. What it is all about, is when and how to safely delete them
with no memory leaks, no use-after-free and no performance penalty on
the hotpath. And that is surprisingly hard to model correctly.
In fact, most of the time I spent on SMP went exactly to this – how to
safely clean everything up in the right order without impeding
performance badly. And still I'm opening more and more cans of worms.
After SMP gets stable, our positions on this should clarify a lot as
there are some specific ways how to do stuff inside SMP BIRD
thread-safely and all the other ways just fail badly. Until then, the
dynamic route insertion is just a well concealed footgun.
Thank you for your understanding.
Maria
Em ter., 28 de mar. de 2023 às 04:01, Maria Matejka via Bird-users
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> escreveu:
Hello!
Yes, you shall run "birdc conf" yourself when your conffile is
ready. What if BIRD started the autoreconfig right when you're
writing the file? You could easily get strange behavior like
accidentally removing a bunch of protocols by loading a partial
config file. You'd have to assure atomic exchange of the file – and
this way, you may just run the reconfigure command explicitly anyway.
There are some internal drafts on how to dynamically add routes
without having to reload possibly large config files, yet we haven't
decided on any approach yet, let aside actually implementing it.
Maria
On 28 March 2023 00:55:04 CEST, "Pedro Henrique de Araújo Marques"
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Good evening, I'm doing some tests with BIRD for a while now and
I would like some help with a problem I'm facing. I have the
following BIRD configuration:
*router id 10.0.0.128;*
*
*
*ipv4 table master4;*
*ipv6 table master6;*
*flow4 table flowtab4;*
*flow6 table flowtab6;*
*
*
*filter subnet_group1{*
* if(bgp_community.len = 0) then {*
* bgp_community.add((555,555));*
* accept;*
* }*
* else{ accept; }*
*
*
*};*
*
*
*protocol bgp uplink1{*
* local as 129;*
* neighbor 10.0.1.128 as 128;*
* multihop 1;*
* ipv4{*
* import filter { accept; };*
* export filter subnet_group1;*
* };*
* ipv6{*
* import filter { accept; };*
* export filter subnet_group1;*
* };*
*};*
*
*
*protocol static blackhole_ipv4_routes{*
* route 10.0.90.100/32 <http://10.0.90.100/32> blackhole;*
* route 10.0.90.99/32 <http://10.0.90.99/32> blackhole;*
* ipv4;*
*};*
I created a script that after some time it inserts some new
routes into the blackhole_ipv4_routes protocol defined above,
let's say all of 10.0.0.0/24 <http://10.0.0.0/24> for example.
Is there an option that I could use in the config file to detect
this change and update bird accordingly with the new table
additions, or do I need to always call 'birdc -configure' after
the script ends?
--
Douglas Fernando Fischer
Engº de Controle e Automação
