W dniu 21.04.2023 o 09:20, Ondrej Filip pisze:
Dear BIRD Users,
we're presenting you a new alpha version of the Multithreaded BIRD. Contrary to the previous version, you have to set your desired number of threads in config by the threads N; option.

Version 3.0alpha1 fixes a lot of bugs found in previous versions. Our tests show that the overall performance may be about 3-8 times better than v2.0.12; yet the real life always brings questions and problems which the development can't anticipate fully.

Please run your tests and we hope we get back to you soon with a stable version. Looking forward to your reports.

I thank my colleagues and namely Maria for this release!

Cheers
    Ondrej


Dear BIRD Developers,

I have tested the Netlink flavor of FreeBSD port. At a glance there are at least 2 problems:

1. Memory (resident) usage at the init is about 125% of BIRD 2.13, moreover it's constantly growing and after 30 min it was about 300% of shown by BIRD 2.13.

2. Some routes are not learned correctly, for example:

Apr 27 20:20:23 rtr bird[40469]: bgp_rmsk_v4: Invalid route x.y.140.0/22 withdrawn Apr 27 20:20:23 rtr bird[40469]: bgp_rmsk_v4: Invalid route x.y.160.0/22 withdrawn Apr 27 20:20:23 rtr bird[40469]: bgp_rmsk_v4: Invalid route x.y.184.0/22 withdrawn Apr 27 20:20:23 rtr bird[40469]: bgp_rmsk_v4: Invalid route y.y.184.0/24 withdrawn Apr 27 20:20:23 rtr bird[40469]: bgp_rmsk_v4: Malformed bgp_unknown_0x15 attribute - conflicting flags (e0, expected 80) Apr 27 20:20:23 rtr bird[40469]: bgp_rmsk_v4: Malformed bgp_unknown_0x15 attribute - conflicting flags (e0, expected 80) Apr 27 20:20:23 rtr bird[40469]: bgp_rmsk_v4: Malformed bgp_unknown_0xff attribute - conflicting flags (e0, expected 80) Apr 27 20:20:23 rtr bird[40469]: bgp_rmsk_v4: Malformed bgp_unknown_0xff attribute - conflicting flags (e0, expected 80)

It came out, that in BIRD 2.13 at least some of these problematic routes have special attributes, for example:

BGP.ff [t]: 00 00 07 db 00 00 00 01 00 01 00 0a ff 08 00 00 00 00 ea 44 42 79

Thanks for giving the opportunity to test !

Cheers

--
Marek Zarychta

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to