Hans Aberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 25 Aug 2005, at 19:04, Paul Eggert wrote: > >> Perhaps it'd be better to drop the postprocessor phase entirely; it's >> nice in some respects, but I'm afraid it's turning out to be more >> trouble than it's worth. > > What do you have in your mind here?
Nothing concrete yet. Perhaps just come up with a minimal macro language and implement it in C. I hate to reinvent the wheel, but M4 isn't working out well.
