[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > now there are multiple lower level routines used for output > instead of only one printf (which has some safety features),
In my experience printf is less safe than putc fputs etc., since printf isn't type-checked well. > maybe there are more possible issues if parsers are used on > embedded GNU/LINUX devices with exotic c libraries. Sorry, I still don't follow this point. Such parsers, if they define YYFPRINTF, will still work as before. So what are the issues?
