On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Joel E. Denny wrote:
On Tue, 20 Sep 2005, Joel E. Denny wrote:
In the event of memory exhaustion, if stack 0 happens to be marked for
deletion (guaranteeing that in a test case is not something I want to think
about), no user destructors are called on any symbols.
I created a test case.
<snip>
I created a patch using this approach.
I've only tested after applying my earlier `duplicated user destructor for
lookahead' patch, which I cut from the diff for this patch.
I just want to be sure the two patches and one test case mentioned above
are not forgotten. You can find them here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bison-patches/2005-09/msg00078.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bison-patches/2005-09/msg00109.html
Joel
