On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, Hans Aberg wrote:
The "p" might be convenient if both variables are to be used side by side. However, also consider the multilingual issue: it won't be needed under C++.
Because it will always be a pointer? Or because it will always be an object?
So in order to keep multilingual similarity, that suggests just naming it "yystack", without a "p". Names with a "p" added should then be reserved for C implementation variables, but not in the interface.
I don't believe yystack is part of the interface. Joel
