On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, Paul Eggert wrote: > > also GLR is not mentioned on the homepage of Bison > > and GLR nowadays is going every day better and better. > > That's a documentation fix, I guess. Suggestions, anybody?
We're talking about this, right? http://www.gnu.org/software/bison/ The introduction in the documentation would need the same update. A simple fix would be to replace: for an LALR context-free grammar into a C program with: for an LALR(1) or GLR context-free grammar into a C or C++ program Also, replace: You need to be fluent in C programming with: You need to be fluent in C or C++ programming Is this reasonable? Can someone think of something better? Joel
