Le 11 mai 06 à 18:57, Paul Eggert a écrit :
Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:So, what is our attitude? If we start worrying about such bugs, we might as well document it in the FAQ. Or we can have configure issue a warning stating that W.L. Estes doesn't care about generating code for pre-C99, so examples/calc++ is likely to fail ? Or be robust to that bug?The bug is in the code that flex generates; it has nothing to do with how we use the code. It's not clear to me how Bison could work around the bug in general. I have documented the problem in the Bison manual, as follows: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bison-patches/2006-02/msg00035.html
:) :) OK, thanks.
