"Joel E. Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Personally, I like that <...> always delimits a semantic-type. (I don't > like that %merge uses it, but that's another can of worms.)
I don't like the %merge <...> syntax either. It's an oddball special case for <...>, and I tripped over it again while installing my recent POSIX-compatibility fixes. Would anyone object if we changed that syntax by dropping the < and >? E.g., instead of "%merge <stmtMerge>" users would write "%merge stmtMerge".
