"Joel E. Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If non-aliased string literals are reasonable, it seems odd to me that > Bison won't let you declare your own token number for a non-aliased string > literal. That is, %token only understands a string literal as an alias. > Maybe this isn't worth worrying about: the user can always come up with a > dummy token name. > > What do you think?
I don't have a strong opinion.
