On Sat, 19 Aug 2006, Paul Eggert wrote: > "Joel E. Denny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I've just noticed that I'm not being so consistent with how I choose where > > to add test cases. Should all bugs be demonstrated in regression.at? Or > > is it better to be more specific when another set, like input.at, makes > > sense? > > I prefer the latter, as it has better long-term implications, but it's > not a huge deal either way.
That's my thinking as well... when I can remember. Thanks. Joel
