Re: FYI: default %printer/%destructor

[Paolo Bonzini]

Joel E. Denny wrote:
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
What about <UNTAGGED>?  As in

An existing grammar might have a union field named UNTAGGED.

Can't deny that, but it seems unlikely...  <!> is really too 
hieroglyphic for me.  If anything, I would prefer <> or a trailing 
%untagged...

Paolo