On Mon, 13 Nov 2006, Paul Eggert wrote: > One could make good technical arguments for Guile, Java, OCaml, > Python, Ruby, Squeak, and others (note that I've been careful to list > them alphabetically :-). But C++ wouldn't make the long list, much > less the short one.
Given your concern with performance, I'm surprised to see scripting languages in the list. Maybe they're not as slow as I thought? > I'd rather not go into language-war mode at this point, though. I'm not interested in that either. > Unless someone has a _lot_ of high-quality time to sink into this, > I wouldn't advocate a switch. I was hoping you were thinking of some C variation that would compile Bison as is (or nearly) but give us some additional capabilities. Unfortunately, C++ is the only one I'm familiar with, but I was hoping you might know of others.
