On Tue, 21 Nov 2006, Hans Aberg wrote: > > Why can't you use C++ OO? Pointers to non-POD's work fine. Polymorphism > > works fine. The rest of your program (besides the parser) can use > > non-POD's without restraint. There's also the C++ standard library. > > If one should program in what essentially is the C-subset
Why are you assuming this? > As for my program, the parser builds dynamic iterated polymorphic objects, > and in cmopbination with a reference count, that is very convenient. I have programs that do this too. Inside the union, pointers to non-POD's work fine.
