On Thu, 7 Dec 2006, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > The main objection was that other people might then think about > language-dependent parsing of the Bison skeleton (for example, as in Perl, > because of clashes between the "$N"/"@N" variables, and the internal syntax of > the language).
What's wrong with that? Couldn't it prove to be necessary in order to support some languages? If you would prefer to point me to a previous post, that's fine.
