On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 01:17:54PM -0500, Joel E. Denny wrote: > On Tue, 26 Dec 2006, Bob Rossi wrote: > > > > Thanks for that suggestion. What do you think of the attached > > > uncommitted > > > patch? Also attached are the results that I get from etc/bench.pl after > > > applying all of this patch except the push.c portion. Finally, attached > > > are the results after applying all of the patch. Notice that, for pull > > > mode, switching from yacc.c to push.c has little impact. However, the > > > impact of switching to push mode is improved by this patch. > > > > These timing results look great to me. > > > > The key component was obviously making sure the yacc impure/pure parser > > was the same as the push impure/pure parser. These results obviously show > > that. > > Thanks. I committed it.
What's left to do here? Do you have a list of things? Thanks, Bob Rossi
